Search for: "Smith v. Shaw" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm by Alex Gasser
Patent No. 5,546,448 in combination with ITU V.34 reference, and ALJ Shaw further determined that secondary considerations such as long-felt need, and commercial success supported the validity of the ‘896 patent. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:22 am by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Smith(2/16/12]) the Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for driving while impaired upon a holding that the trial court erred in permitting the People to introduce evidence that Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:59 am by Alexandra Allan
Reed Smith (Lianjun Li and Min Li of the Hong Kong office, Nick Shaw and Halani Lloyd of the London office) recently represented the successful Charterers in Shagang South-Asia (Hong Kong) Trading Co. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am by Michelle Yeary
  There are many good aspects to the summary judgment ruling in Shaw v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm by Rick Hasen
Court, remedial action by this court, or future action by the Legislature.’ Order (Doc. 528) at 14 (Smith, J., dissenting), Perez, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:37 am by sally
Supreme Court Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13 (10 March 2010) RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Company KG (UK Production) [2010] UKSC 14 (10 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Chima v R [2010] EWCA Crim 416 (10 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Steenberg & Anor v Enterprise Inns Plc & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 201 (10 March 2010) Smith, R (on the application of) v Land Registry… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
He was the author of the INTA amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Addressing Personal Device Usage in the Workplace – Minneapolis lawyer V. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:50 pm by Anna Gallegos
  Employer Beware: The FMLA Can Reach Further Than You May Think - Houston lawyer Clark Smith of Seyfarth Shaw in Employment Law Lookout. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Smith, Third Circuit: As part of Appellant Smith's sentence for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft, he was ordered to pay restitution of $68,452. [read post]