Search for: "SmithKline Beecham"
Results 1 - 20
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
We don't know whether lawyers at SmithKline Beecham were aware of the suppressed information, reported in the Times and Journal yesterday, that showed that its diabetes medicine, Avandia, might actually be "riskier to the heart" than a competitor's product (and in any event not better). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’ in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am
The court had previously allowed the plaintiffs to proceed with allegations that Glaxo SmithKline (formed by the merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham in 2000) caused them to overpay for Flonase by repeatedly filing sham citizen petitions that stalled the entry of generic nasal sprays into the market. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
SmithKline Beecham v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
The topic is ‘Smithkline Beecham v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:40 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 489708 (9th Cir. 2/14/11), the Ninth Circuit has upheld a district court's finding that pharmaceutical sales representatives (PSRs) are exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).The plaintiffs sued GlaxoSmithKline ("Glaxo") for overtime under the FLSA. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:49 pm
Noonan -- On October 9th, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham, the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm
This dispute between Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Abbott Laboratories stems from a licensing disagreement and the pricing of HIV medications. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
A 5-4 decision upholding the Ninth Circuit's ruling that SmithKline was entitled to classify the plaintiffs as outside salesman exempt from the FLSA wage-and-hour requirements. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:56 am
By Donald Zuhn -- Last Wednesday, Plaintiffs-Appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:59 am
Plaintiffs-Appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:41 am
By Donald Zuhn -- On Wednesday, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham plc, and Glaxo Group Ltd., and two of which support Defendants-Appellants the USPTO and Director Dudas. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Also seeking a rehearing of the Federal Circuit's decision in Tafas were plaintiffs-appellees SmithKline Beecham Corp., SmithKline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Ltd. [read post]
