Search for: "SmithKline Beecham Limited" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’  in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to  Final Rules published by the USPTO that  placed [...] [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am by Dennis Crouch
SmithKline Beecham Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2456043 (3rd Cir. 2013). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
SmithKline Beecham Corp., in which the Court will have to determine whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are subject to the “outside sales” exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Smithkline Beecham Corp., No. 09-50244, 2010 WL 1010591 (5th Cir. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 4:38 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline survived summary judgment in March when defendant GlaxoSmithKline argued that the doctrine of federal pre-emption precluded the plaintiffs from pursuing their state products liability claim. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:25 am by John Day
  Here is link to all of the briefs in the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:03 am by Todd B. Scherwin
SmithKline Beecham (No. 10-15257, opinion by Judge Milan D. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
This time, the plaintiff is pharmaceutical giant SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
SmithKline that pharmaceutical sales reps are exempt from overtime and President Obama shielding—at least temporarily—illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 2726259 (S.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:08 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. 08-60522-CIV, 2008 WL 3286976 (S.D. [read post]