Search for: "Smithkline Beecham Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 3:18 am
SmithKline Beecham plc and others v Avery and others [2009] EWHC 1488 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 218 “The word ‘person’  in section 1(1A)(c) Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is not limited to individuals and includes a body corporate, so a company may apply for an injunction under section 3A on grounds of unlawful harassment of its [...] [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
This dispute between Smithkline Beecham Corporation and Abbott Laboratories stems from a licensing disagreement and the pricing of HIV medications. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in SmithKline Beecham Corporation (GSK) v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Dudas, Docket No. 1:07cv846, as combined with Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
PRESS RELEASE: GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK) today announced that it has reached agreement with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to join the USPTO’s motion to dismiss its litigation over Final Regulations published in August 2007 (Triantafyllos Tafas and SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC and Glaxo Group Limited vs. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:36 am by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2012 WL 1057435 (E.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The case involving the removal of a juror because of his sexual orientation (Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:07 am
Cir. 2009, 08-1352) Triantafyllos Tafas, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Glaxo Group Limited (collectively “Appellees”) originally filed suit against the USPTO in relation to  Final Rules published by the USPTO that  placed [...] [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 11:43 am by Dennis Crouch
SmithKline Beecham Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2456043 (3rd Cir. 2013). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:14 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Amy Beth Dambeck
  Factual Background Defendant, SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SmithKline”) is a pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures, and sells prescription drugs. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
This time, the plaintiff is pharmaceutical giant SmithKline Beecham Corporation (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline). [read post]