Search for: "Snow v. Snow"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 5:28 am
" Young v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Sissom v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 6:49 am
See Nazar v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
That prior legal standard for snow and ice liability would be replaced by the groundbreaking case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:35 am
That prior legal standard for snow and ice liability would be replaced by the groundbreaking case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:20 am
In Chittenden v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 6:37 am
Leaving snow and ice on cars can cause dangerous accidents, December 6, 2016, By Cassie Schrim, Fox News More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:02 am
Fisher v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:37 pm
That all changed with the Supreme Judicial Court’s 2010 decision, Papadopoulos v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:05 am
With the case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
In the ruling, Papadopoulos v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:59 pm
Recently in Matal v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm
In Pareja v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:29 pm
Last August I blogged about the watershed case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
A new law took effect in July 2010, when the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in the case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Bourgeois v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
General awareness that snow and ice may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused the plaintiff's fall (see Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967; Gloria v MGM Emerald Enterprs., 298 AD2d 355). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” In Brinkman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff would not have been able to prove that the premises owner did not, by its own snow and ice removal efforts, create or exacerbate the allegedly dangerous condition which caused the plaintiff's injuries (see Sut v City Cinemas Corp., 71 AD3d 759; Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703; see also Robles v City of New York, 56 AD3d 647;… [read post]
