Search for: "Sons of Confederate Veterans, Virginia Division"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 1:28 pm
A Fourth Circuit panel issued its opinion in Sons of Confederate Veterans, Virginia Division v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 12:48 am
Among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed against the city were the Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., and The Monument Fund, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
In both cases members of the Texas Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans sued to reverse the removals. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:56 am
The lawsuit filed last March by the Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. and the Monument Fund, Inc. claims that the Lee statue is a war memorial for veterans and protected by a state law. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:29 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans—Confederate flagsUtah v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans (TSCV), which poses the question whether Texas violated the First Amendment when it denied TSCV’s application for a state-issued license plate with a Confederate battle flag logo. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:02 am
Charlottesville by local residents, the Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. and the Monument Fund, Inc. claimed that the Lee statue was a war memorial for veterans and protected by state law. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:46 pm
I now see that the Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans is pushing a similar monument preservation bill. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:15 pm
Meanwhile, the incident got me interested in the organization promulgating the view that thousands of African Americans fought for the Confederacy, the Sons of Confederate Veterans. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. 14-144Issue: (1) Whether the messages and images that appear on state-issued specialty license plates qualify as government speech immune from any requirement of viewpoint neutrality; and (2) whether Texas engaged in “viewpoint discrimination” by rejecting the license-plate design proposed by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, when Texas has not issued any license plate that… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. 14-144Issue: (1) Whether the messages and images that appear on state-issued specialty license plates qualify as government speech immune from any requirement of viewpoint neutrality; and (2) whether Texas engaged in “viewpoint discrimination” by rejecting the license-plate design proposed by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, when Texas has not issued any license plate that… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. 14-144Issue: (1) Whether the messages and images that appear on state-issued specialty license plates qualify as government speech immune from any requirement of viewpoint neutrality; and (2) whether Texas engaged in “viewpoint discrimination” by rejecting the license-plate design proposed by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, when Texas has not issued any license plate that… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. 14-144Issue: (1) Whether the messages and images that appear on state-issued specialty license plates qualify as government speech immune from any requirement of viewpoint neutrality; and (2) whether Texas engaged in “viewpoint discrimination” by rejecting the license-plate design proposed by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, when Texas has not issued any license plate that… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144, as its preferred vehicle (“vehicle,” get it? [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144, the Sons of Confederate Veterans (who, if their name is true in any non-metaphorical sense, must consist of a small number of very pruney men) sought approval from the Texas DMV for a specialty license plate containing its logo, “a square confederate battle flag surrounded … by the words ‘Sons of Confederate Veterans 1896. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, the majority holds that the specialty license-plate designs offered by Texas constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse the design proposed by the Confederate heritage group that featured a Confederate battle flag. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144, and Berger v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:36 am
Day on January 16, two states observed a different holiday: King-Lee Day, which commemorates both King and Confederate general Robert E. [read post]
