Search for: "Soon C. Pae"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
The IPKat clearly isn't a NPE (non-playful entity) (c) Stephan Czuratis The authors also found evidence of last-minute transfers and discovered that, 'if a patent asserted in litigation is transferred once, it is likely to be transferred again', a clear signal of the development of an active trading market. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
This one is on why courts generally view pseudonymous litigation as denying valuable information to the public; I'll have more soon on other reasons against pseudonymity, as well as other reasons in favor. [* * *] [1.] [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
. * Internet patents, NPEs/PAEs, etc. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
The orders were neither ultra vires nor exceptional—The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been moving toward greater ownership transparency for years, the advisory committees have recommended that judges have the right to such disclosure and are considering further requirements,[21] and similar requirements in Federal District courts across the nation have been in place for years, in districts in, for example, California, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, and… [read post]
