Search for: "Southern Implants, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Bard Inc. and 31 other vaginal-implant companies to study rates of organ damage and complications linked to the implants after manufacturers were sued over the devices. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm by Searcy Law
Bard, Inc. faces more than 13,000 lawsuits in the federal MDL, which is situated in the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm by Searcy Law
Bard, Inc. faces more than 13,000 lawsuits in the federal MDL, which is situated in the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:23 pm by Searcy Law
Bard, Inc. faces more than 13,000 lawsuits in the federal MDL, which is situated in the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:59 pm by Hollis Wright
Judicial Panel overseeing Multidistrict Litigation consolidated lawsuits into Multidistrict Litigation No. 2570 in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Bard Inc. must pay a Bakersfield woman $5.5 million in damages in what promises to be the first of thousands of vaginal mesh injury cases to go to trial. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:35 am
District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (Charleston). [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 11:12 pm
District Court in the Southern District of West Virginia. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:36 am
CR Bard, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Virginia, is one of approximately 3,600 cases pending against Bard in which women allege that erosion of the mesh products have caused organ damage, made sexual intercourse painful, and caused women to have to undergo additional surgical procedures to remove the mesh products. [read post]
18 May 2013, 10:49 am
The federal lawsuits against Bayer have been consolidated in the Southern District of New Year for pre-trial work up and discovery. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:38 am
In 2002, the Southern District of Indiana declared the '288 patent invalid in Cardiac Pacemaker, Inc. v. [read post]