Search for: "Staples the Office Superstore, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2019, 5:00 am
ABSTRACT: On September 4, 1996, the two largest office superstore chains... [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONC. v Heights Broadway, LLC [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 1:22 pm
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, supported what employers have been arguing since Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claims became the norm in wage and hour litigation: courts can and should strike PAGA actions if they are unmanageable. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:16 am
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC (“Wesson”), holding that trial courts have discretion to strike claims brought under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) when a trial of the action would be unmanageable. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, the California Court of Appeals held that trial courts have inherent authority to ensure that Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) claims are manageable at trial, and may strike PAGA classes that are not manageable. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 6:02 pm
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC, the California Court of Appeals held that trial courts have inherent authority to ensure that Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) claims are manageable at trial, and may strike PAGA classes that are not manageable. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC[1], which felt like a breath of fresh air for employers, if not for a brief moment. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
Staples of the Offices Superstore, LLC and Estrada v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
., Serial No. 77677661 [Section 2(d) refusal to register INVISIBLE for hair care preparations in view of the identical mark registered for cosmetics].July 19, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Staples The Office Superstore LLC, Serial No. 78411419 [Section 2(d) refusal to register ONE.TOUCH for "non-electric staplers and hole punchers," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark ONE-TOUCH for ring binders].July 26, 2011 - 11 AM: In re Johnson… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
., Serial No. 77394063 [Refusal to register THREE CARD POKER for “Entertainment services, namely, providing live games of chance in gaming establishments" on the ground of genericness].June 30, 2011 - 12 PM: In re Staples The Office Superstore LLC, Serial No. 78411419 [Section 2(d) refusal to register ONE.TOUCH for "non-electric staplers and hole punchers," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark ONE-TOUCH for ring… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
., Serial No. 77411442 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark YUKON CLASSIC for backpacks and clothing [CLASSIC disclaimed] in light of the registered mark YUKON for footwear, backpacks, and clothing].October 28, 2010 - 10:30 AM: In re Staples The Office Superstore LLC, Serial No. 78411419 [Section 2(d) refusal to register ONE.TOUCH for "non-electric staplers and hole punchers," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark… [read post]
California Supreme Court Holds That Trial Courts May Not Strike PAGA Claims on Manageability Grounds
18 Jan 2024, 11:35 am
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 1:31 pm
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:18 am
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 8:17 am
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC Plaintiff Fred Wesson was a former store general manager (“GM”) of Staples retail stores around Los Angeles. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC (2021) 68 Cal.App.5th 746, previously the only published California appellate decision addressing this issue. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
Thread Pit, Inc., Cancellation No. 92047436 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark shown below for "wearing apparel, namely, jackets, sweatshirts, sweat pants, hats, scarves, jerseys, jeans, turtlenecks, and bikinis," on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likely dilution of, Petitioner's allegedly-famous "polo player" design mark, for various clothing items].October 25, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Staples The Office… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm
Staples of the Offices Superstore, LLC and Estrada v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Nor did Fuhrmann v Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc,which the district court relied on, bar the employee’s claim as it never mentioned Section 4633 and assessed only whether the legislature intended to allow suits against individual supervisors, not what it intended about suits against non-employer third parties. [read post]
