Search for: "Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 5:22 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc, et al.... [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
Each of these brands sells goods relating to figure skating, and thus use various forms of intellectual property protections to safeguard their brand from the competition. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
Each of these brands sells goods relating to figure skating, and thus use various forms of intellectual property protections to safeguard their brand from the competition. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
Each of these brands sells goods relating to figure skating, and thus use various forms of intellectual property protections to safeguard their brand from the competition. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
Each of these brands sells goods relating to figure skating, and thus use various forms of intellectual property protections to safeguard their brand from the competition. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:53 am
In Star Athletica v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:43 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
(Varsity Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
(Varsity Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of separability analysis, by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
Varsity Brands, Inc, et al. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
” In The University of Pennsylvania’s Regulatory Review, law student Leah Wong looks at the court’s decision this term in in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
A recent Supreme Court case, Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm
In Star Athletica, industry titan Varsity Brands and market new-comer Star Athletica disagreed whether the actual designs on a clothing item constituted a protectable work of art, or merely a common design that lacks copyright protection. [read post]
