Search for: "State of Hawaii by its Attorney General v. Nature Conservancy, The et al" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2009, 1:06 am
Or in the 2006 case of Kelly vs. 1250 Oceanside Partners et. al., Hawaii  County argued that although the Hawaii Constitution says "public trust" natural resource conservation obligations are the responsibility of the state and its "political subdivisions" (Hawaii County being a political subdivision), only the State not the County has these "public trust"… [read post]