Search for: "State of California Board of Equalization"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2021, 8:45 am
Breann serves as a significant contributor at the California State Board of Equalization (BOE) meetings. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:48 pm
The post California Lawmakers Propose Constitutional Amendment to Abolish the State Board of Equalization appeared first on SeeSALT Blog. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
A federal district court judge in California just gave the IRS the green light to conduct a "John Doe" summons on the California State Board of Equalization. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The California State Board of Equalization (BOE or SBE) California sales tax. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 2:15 pm
By law the California State Board of Equalization (SBE) is required to publish each quarter a list of the 250 sales and use tax debts owed to the California. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 6:41 am
The lawsuit, filed by the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, alleged that the state law, signed last year, violated California’s constitutional equal protection clause. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:21 pm
The California State Board of Equalization (BOE or SBE) was handed a defeat by the California Appellate Court in Dell Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:35 am
A California court has struck down California’s board diversity statute, AB 979 as violating the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
17 May 2022, 7:37 pm
The post California judge rules law requiring gender-inclusive boards of directors violates state constitution appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:43 am
To make matters worse, the BOE can share information with the California Franchise Tax Board and the IRS, resulting in more tax assessments, penalties, and interest due to delinquent state and federal income tax debt. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
Padilla, a judge ruled that the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution because it created a suspect gender classification without a compelling state interest, and the law was not necessary or narrowly tailored to achieve the State’s goals of remedying gender discrimination or benefiting the economy. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm
Last month, the California Secretary of State appealed the decision by a California Superior Court striking down as unconstitutional California’s board diversity law, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in the State to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:16 am
Dave blogged last week that a California court struck down the state’s board gender diversity statute, finding that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The court abrogated Section 301.3, which mandated the appointment of a minimum number of females to boards, concluding that the statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:15 am
Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:15 am
Therefore, for all the above stated reasons and analysis the Court determines that S.B. 826 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution and is thus enjoined. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:26 am
In September of 2018, California was the first state in the U.S. to sign into law mandatory gender diversity on boards of public companies listed on a major U.S. stock exchange. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
There’s a problem with that, though: California signed a multi-state compact that said the factors would be weighed equally. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Framed as a “taxpayer suit,” the litigation sought a judgment declaring the expenditure of taxpayer funds to enforce or implement SB 826 to be illegal and an injunction preventing the California Secretary of State from expending taxpayer funds for those purposes, alleging that the law’s mandate was an unconstitutional gender-based quota and violated the Equal Protection Provisions of the California Constitution. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Framed as a “taxpayer suit,” the litigation sought a judgment declaring the expenditure of taxpayer funds to enforce or implement SB 826 to be illegal and an injunction preventing the California Secretary of State from expending taxpayer funds for those purposes, alleging that the law’s mandate was an unconstitutional gender-based quota and violated the Equal Protection Provisions of the California Constitution. [read post]
