Search for: "Sterling Jewelers Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2019, 5:28 am by Sara E. Teller
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, filed a lawsuit against Sterling Jewelers Inc, accusing the wholly owned jewelry subsidiary of Signet Jewelers Ltd, of improper credit financing practices. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by ---------------------------------
Sterling Jewelers Inc., W.D.N.Y., No. 1:11-mc-00028, 2011 WL 5282622, recently enforced a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to Sterling Jewelers Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:27 pm by HowardGutman
  The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau) and the People of the State of New York today settled claims against Sterling Jewelers Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 12:11 pm
On September 23, 2008, the EEOC filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York against Sterling Jewelers Inc., the largest specialty retail jeweler in the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 10:49 am by Melanie Chaney
In Sterling, the EEOC brought an enforcement action against Sterling Jewelers based on 19 charges of nationwide sex-based discrimination in pay and promotion. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am by Gary Siniscalco
On July 24, 2017, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a federal district court’s approval for a class of roughly 69,000 women claiming that Sterling Jewelers, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am by Gary Siniscalco
On July 24, 2017, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a federal district court’s approval for a class of roughly 69,000 women claiming that Sterling Jewelers, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:38 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
The CFPB and New York Attorney General have agreed to a settlement with Sterling Jewelers Inc. of a lawsuit they filed jointly in a New York federal district court alleging federal and state law violations in connection with credit cards issued by Sterling that could only be used to finance purchases made in the company’s stores. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no evidence that the EEOC had conducted a nationwide investigation before filing a nationwide pattern-and-practice sex discrimination class action, a federal magistrate in New York recommended granting Sterling Jewelers’ motion for partial summary judgment on the EEOC’s claim of nationwide discrimination (EEOC v Sterling Jewelers Inc, January 2, 2014, McCarthy, J). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
Sterling Jewelers, Inc.) affirmed an arbitrator’s decision, concluding that the arbitrator’s analysis should be upheld even if the District Court disagreed with the legal analysis. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Pre-suit investigations by EEOCEEOC v Sterling Jewelers, Inc., USCA, 2ndCircuit, Docket 14-1782Before the EEOC may bring an enforcement action under Title VII against an employer, it must comply with certain administrative obligations, including receiving a formal charge of unlawful discrimination, provide notice of the charge to the employer, investigate the charge and give the employer notice of its determination that there was “reasonable cause” to believe… [read post]