Search for: "Steven Thomason" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2021, 5:07 am by SHG
 How Appealing reported on a recent Eighth Circuit decision by Judge Steven M. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 10:50 am by Howard Bashman
Another federal appellate court isn’t particularly interested in a litigant’s preferred pronouns: Circuit Judge Steven M. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm by Jon Gelman
 An example of the effects of restricting eligibility on workers is provided by Oregon, where Thomason and Burton (2001) estimate that a series of legislative provisions resulted in benefits (and costs) being about 25 percent below the amounts they would have been in the absence of the more restrictive eligibility standards. [read post]