Search for: "Strange v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2016, 11:43 am
Colvin, March 3, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Social Security Disability Claims Process, Jan. 23, 2015, Boston Social Security Disability Insurance Lawyer Blog The post Mabry v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
Attorney Richard Culbertson successfully represented several Social Security disability claimants both before the Social Security Administration and in federal court. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
Additional Resources: Woman sentenced to life for holding disabled people captive, stealing their Social Security payments, November 2, 2015, Fox News, by CNN Wire More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
When he applied for disability benefits, the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) denied his application for benefits. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:57 pm
It's easy to lose sight of this tool in a shed full of strange sounding Social Security acronyms - ALJ, VE, RFC, etc. - but, for claimants seeking to prove they are eligible for disability benefits due to a mental impairment, the GAF score can make or break a claim. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:48 am
When we think of disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA), most people are actually more familiar with the Social Security Disability Program (SSDI). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
" As experienced Social Security disability attorneys who have represented thousands of disability benefits claimants in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, we know all too well that sometimes the Social Security Administration (SSA), its experts and even its judges just plain get it wrong. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:28 pm
Finally, in the Court’s first case on the Affordable Care Act (NFIB v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Although a Social Security regulation has long provided that “[t]he dismissal of a request for Appeals Council review is binding and is not subject to further review,” the Social Security Administration, represented by Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston, agreed with Kimberly that the dismissal was a final decision subject to review but disagreed on one point. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
But the mandate has been challenged repeatedly on grounds of religious freedom.The Strange New War on ContraceptionThe war over the contraceptive mandate is a reflection of larger tensions in society—and a strange arc in which an issue on which there was once broad societal consensus is now divisive. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
H.R.2128: To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of tribal governments in regard to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
H.R.2128: To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of tribal governments in regard to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 9:06 pm
Commissioner of Social Security are simple. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm
” Citing McIntyre v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:59 am
As a matter of faith, he understands himself to be three separate beings: (1) GARY C LIZALEK, "a trust that was created by the Social Security Administration … to generate assets for its beneficiary, the United States Government"; (2) Gary C. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm
France, Stoll v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm
Thus, if each die “as scheduled” by the Social Security administration, husband would collect $452,000 and wife would get $882,000. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
Another important administrative law case, West Virginia v. [read post]
