Search for: "Strickland v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Strickland Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandSUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Strickland (07-689) and Friday in Negusie v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0144p.06 2007/04/23 USA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:04 am
Moet Hennessy USA, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
What does the USA Today story say about that? [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Ted Strickland Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0369p.06 2008/10/10 Johnson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
USA v Abu Ali, June 9, 2008. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm
Amnesty Int’l USA – a case involving the interception of communications from abroad (standing issue); Comcast v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:55 am
CARLA STRICKLAND v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
We AFFIRM 07a0126p.06 2007/04/06 USA v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
City of Roswell, 13-975, and M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
For the reasons discussed below, we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE in part. 07a0199p.06 2007/05/31 USA v. [read post]
