Search for: "Sundown Operating Company Inc"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., a California appellate court held in Kelley v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
United Cellular, Inc., the allegation is that the company failed to make reasonable accommodations for an observant Seventh Day Adventist employee. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:51 am
Include a statement that the company will make reasonable accommodations unless doing so with impose an undue hardship on the company. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:47 pm
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:30 am
Here’s what supposedly happened according to the Division on Civil Rights: During an all-staff meeting in October 2016, the company’s Director of Business Operations, and also the Complainant’s direct supervisor, said the Complainant could use her “gaydar” to determine whether or not a new client was a lesbian. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:50 am
The company appears to have allowed a small number of Muslim employees to take unscheduled prayer breaks at sunrise or sundown without a problem, but when its ranks of Somali employees grew substantially, it put its foot down and decided to limit prayers to the two scheduled break periods allotted to all employees. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 pm
Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Rock-Tenn Services, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
Bruce Church, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Reema Consulting Services, Inc., the answer is yes. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Its business model is to provide banking services to crypto-asset companies. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The Director also told her that the position would be filled as a civilian contractor through an outside company. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
