Search for: "Superior Court of the State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 2:25 pm
Superior Court (State of California), 182 Cal. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
Apr. 1, 2022), the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles (Green, J.) declared that Section 301.4 of the California Corporations Code is unconstitutional under the California state Constitution. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:10 am
Superior Court may have a profound impact upon major public works projects throughout the state. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:10 am
Superior Court may have a profound impact upon major public works projects throughout the state. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:44 am
Los Angeles County Superior Court, Sacramento County Superior Court, San Diego County Superior Court, Riverside County Superior Court, San Bernardino County Superior Court, Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:54 am
Yesterday, the the California Fourth District Court of Appeal overturned an Orange County Superior Court judge’s ruling siding with Huntington Beach... [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 2:08 pm
[JURIST] The California Superior Court [official website] on Friday rejected a challenge [application, PDF] to the state's recently enacted physician-assisted suicide law. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Lex Machina now provides analytics for over 1.5 million California superior court cases and has total state court coverage of 2.5 million cases, it says. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:18 pm
Superior Court will take place on Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in San Francisco. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:38 am
Sacramento County Superior Court is an important venue for California state litigation, since it is located in the California State Capitol and therefore is a key source of civil cases involving government entities and businesses. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
California Superior Court Judge holds that California's teacher tenure laws are unconstitutional Source: Findlaw – Breaking Legal Documents [By Adam Ramirez, June 10, 2014]“California's laws on teacher tenure, layoffs and dismissals deprive students of their constitutional right to an education, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday, June 10, 2014. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:07 pm
Superior Court (International Rectifier Corp.) (5/23/12) --- Cal.App.4th ----, the Court of Appeal held that California law, rather than Delaware law, applies to the wrongful termination claim of an officer of a corporation organized under Delaware law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
In a similar case against State Farm, a California Superior Court judge has now certified a class. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 pm
Judge Carl West of the Los Angeles County Superior Court [official website] recommended [Reuters report] that the state court lawsuits be heard by a judge in Orange County. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court: Takeaways for California Workers," is by yours truly and is an edited and somewhat expanded version of my original post on Brinker. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:38 pm
Allegedly, this was the largest Zoom meeting of its kind regarding the state of the court in the State of California. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 11:28 am
Superior Court should be applied retroactively. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:17 am
This week, a Los Angeles Superior Court was the first California state court to apply the determination, dismissing armored truck drivers’ claims against a security company because federal hours of service rules governing commercial truck drivers preempt California’s meal and rest break rules for both long- and short-haul drivers. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 3:18 pm
The California Court of Appeal denied this request. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:40 pm
State Water Resources Control Board, Case No. 34-2009-80000338 (Sacramento Superior Court; Dec. 2, 2011) By Keith Garner and Alex Merritt On December 2, 2011, the Sacramento Superior Court invalidated the numeric limits on turbidity and pH in California's Construction General Permit (CGP) because the limits were not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
