Search for: "Supreme Builders" Results 1 - 20 of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 6:25 am
  However, the recent decision impacting builders from the Iowa Supreme Court makes it significantly more important for builders and other contractors to do so.The Iowa Supreme Court ruling essentially says that builders must provide a 15-year implied warranty for their work. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:02 pm by Vishnu S
Ipsita Mishra Builders will have to pay Value Added Tax now according to the decison given by the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:00 am
My friend and law partner Matt Gardner has an excellent summary on Sullivan & Ward's Iowa Law Blog about the crushing blow handed down to home builders this past Friday by the Iowa Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:38 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0575, 2012 MT 93N, LOKEN BUILDERS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:27 am
This was the recent ruling of the Michigan Supreme Court in Liss v Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 478 Mich 203; 732 NW2d 514 (Mich Sup Ct, June 6, 2007).In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court overruled two earlier decisions of the Michigan Court of Appeals -- Forton v Laszar, 239 Mich App 711, 609 NW2d 850 (2000), and Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg Co, Inc v Dailey, 266 Mich App 545, 701 NW2d 749 (2005) -- which had permitted homeowners to sue home builders under the… [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 2:01 pm
Co., Inc., 384 S.E.2d 730 (S.C. 1989), the South Carolina Supreme Court determined that a builder may be liable in tort if he violates an applicable building code, deviates from industry standards, or constructs housing that he knows or should know will pose serious risks of physical harm. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm by Andrew A. Stulce
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin reversed and held that policy interpretation was for the trial court, not the jury. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:15 am by Veronica
"Builder's PAC aided judge": Today's Dallas Morning News contains this article that begins: "A political committee funded by homebuilder Bob Perry contributed $16,000 to help Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht pay his legal bills as the court was preparing to hear arguments in a case against the company. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
Ex-judges sue Rossi, builders, challenge fundraising | Seattle Times Newspaper, Oct. 7, 2008. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:00 am by Rob Davis
Builders’ lien claimants and owners alike should be aware of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pinnacle Living (Capstan Village) Lands Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Court of Appeal applied recent decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada which limited the interjurisdictional immunity principle to circumstances in which provincial legislation impairs, and not merely affects, a federal power. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:26 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
., 2016 SCC 37, the Supreme Court of Canada has issued a definitive decision about the scope of the “faulty workmanship” exclusion in Builders’ Risk insurance policies. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:20 am by bhamdefenseatty
The Alabama Supreme Court recently considered a suit in which a fire at an apartment building, caused by arson, resulted in the death of one resident, and injuries to six others. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:20 am by bhamdefenseatty
The Alabama Supreme Court recently considered a suit in which a fire at an apartment building, caused by arson, resulted in the death of one resident, and injuries to six others. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:25 am by Howard Bashman
“Biden’s real Supreme Court choice: Bridge-builder or truth-teller? [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:55 am by Howard Bashman
“Associate Justice Elena Kagan, after decade on bench, emerges as Supreme Court ‘bridge-builder'”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Beth Graham
The Supreme Court of Texas has agreed to review whether an arbitration clause applies to a construction dispute between a developer, a builder, an architectural firm, and others. [read post]