Search for: "Supreme Ceiling and Partition, Incorporated"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2020, 9:15 am
The relevant lease clauses were: Clause 2.6 is concerned with alterations, improvements and additions and reads: “Not without the previous written consent of the Landlord to erect any structure pipe partition wire or post upon the Demised Premises nor make or suffer to be made any alteration or improvement in or addition to the Demised Premises. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
(California Supreme Court 2009) 47 Cal.4th 272, 291 (Hernandez ).)M.H.'s contention that section 647(j)(1) incorporates the tort elements of invasion of privacy is forfeited because his attorney took the exact opposite position in the juvenile court, asserting, `This is not a tort case. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
Justice SinghviThe Supreme Court in Ghisalal vs Dhapubai (D) By Lrs. has examined the provisions of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act relating to adoption. [read post]
