Search for: "T&C Equipment" Results 1 - 20 of 2,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Jamie Markham
For now, court officials don’t need to change anything in response to the Richmond County case. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am by MBettman
Without doing violence to the statute, couldn’t the protection be expanded beyond operators to anyone who could potentially be injured by the equipment? [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:53 pm by lbergeson@lawbc.com
 The prepublication version of the WPS notice is available here; the prepublication version of the C&T notice is available here. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:39 am
Our law firm was recently hired by a military veteran who claims to have been infected with the liver disease Hepatitis C by equipment used to perform colonoscopies at the Veterans Administration (VA) hospital in Miami, Florida. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This is Part IV in a series discussing the recent holding in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:26 am
During the colonoscopy, the hospital never sterilized the equipment between patients; rather the equipment was simply rinsed. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 8:54 am by WIMS
Coast Guard: We can't adequately respond to Great Lakes heavy oil spill - The U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:00 am
"Special Risk policies are generally the province of our P&C brethren, and run the gamut from hole-in-one cover to NASCAR events. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm
” Hepatitis C can’t survive outside a human host for more than four days, the documents say, and “substantially more than four days had passed” between any previous patient with Hepatitis C who had a colonoscopy and the one performed on Metzler. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
(Unfortunately, the links reflected below aren't working.) [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:34 am by Jon Brodkin
The altimeter problem has prevented AT&T and Verizon from fully deploying 5G on the C-Band spectrum licenses the wireless carriers purchased for a combined $69 billion. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
The VA has also said it will pay for treatment for the infected vets even if they didn't hepatitis or HIV from the dirty equipment. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:21 pm
Final oddities: since plaintiff didn't own the Hyundai trademark, its pure trademark claims failed, including its dilution claim, since §1125(c) limits relief to "the owner of a famous mark. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” It’s obvious, isn’t it, that paying $100 ought not generate a $200 deduction, spending $1.5 million on depreciable equipment ought not generate $3 million of depreciation, and driving 32 miles ought not generate 48 miles’ worth of deductions? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
Nothing is stupider than reusing invasive medical equipment, but a couple of hospitals in New York don’t seem to have a very high safe-injection IQ. [read post]