Search for: "T-Fal Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 8:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
JC Penney Corp., Inc., 2013 WL 1915681 (N.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But the court expressed willingness to revisit the issue later.Also, TRC’s UCL and FAL claims didn’t attempt to apply California law extraterritorially. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pantron I Corp., 33 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994), rejecting the placebo effect as a way a product could “work. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Target Corp., --- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, 2010 WL 4260891 (Cal.App. 4 Dist.) [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bank of America Corp., 2011 WL 1195973 (N.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pure omissions, when the defendant didn’t make any statement at all about a subject, aren’t covered by the FAL, so those claims also failed. [read post]