Search for: "T. P. v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:10 pm
T-Mobile USA decided today by the Ninth Circuit.We conclude that the Washington State Supreme Court’s decision in Scott v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 06-35909 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:08 am by (admin)
Please don’t assume, son, that all white people view you as a threat. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:33 pm
P. 19(b) factors, which only the enemies of our country don't know by heart. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 2008 WL 5216255, *11–*12 (SD Cal., Aug. 11, 2008). [read post]