Search for: "T. QUILLEN"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
Quillen Jr. has an obsession about patent continuations and RCEs. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:10 pm
Beard, and Quillen/Webster in a 22 Sept. 08 post titled: The 'Wearing Down Examiners' Fallacy. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
Quillen and O. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
Separately, Judge Moore discussed a comparison of Quillen/Webster v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:14 pm
The text at the end of a blogpost at written description caught the eye of IPBizI’m sure others may have suggested similar reforms, and the beauty of a blog post is I don’t need to check and see. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:05 am
Because even weak patents are costly to challenge in court, they say the effect is to stifle real progress.The "patent quality" debate goes back to Quillen and Webster. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 7:58 am
Kevin Garnett didn't play. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
Quillen, Jr., The U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm
Say it ain't so (but you betcha'). [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:26 pm
Lemley/Moore in "Ending Abuse" said Quillen's grant numbers were preferred over Clarke's and then in "Rubber Stamp" that point was treated as "gone. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:38 am
Quillen and and Webster show up, obliquely, through a cite to the NAS/STEP report (footnote 8). [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:56 pm
In the year 2009, LBE still hasn't received a response. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:19 pm
"You should not grant a monopoly to people who don't produce," said Grove, 72. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 10:42 am
However, this number doesn't account for continuations. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
The PTO reports that the rate historically has been about 66%, n17 and that the rate now is only 54%, n18 but their estimate doesn't account for continuations. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:44 pm
There aren’t enough details in the article to say for sure how I would defend him, if I were his attorney, but I did notice that he seems to have left the Boston Market rather than go inside and have the meeting. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:49 am
Using the previous link, one gets an error message: can't open the page “http://jip.kentlaw.edu/art/volume%204/4%20Chi-Kent%20J%20Intell%20Prop%20108.pdf” because [Safari] can’t find the server “jip.kentlaw.edu”.The 2004 article in Kent JIP contained discussion of the odd treatment by Lemley and Moore of work by Clarke:Criticism of Clarke paper by Lemley and Moore. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
Quillen and Webster had been wrong all along. [read post]
