Search for: "TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
In April, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision that bodes well for consumer-plaintiffs suing for deceptive advertising based on foods with label claims that may technically be true, but are nonetheless misleading. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The warranty claims were also dismissed, as were allegations against Mars based on Wrigley’s products and allegations against Wrigley based on Mars products; the allegations that defendants were engaged in a common scheme were too vague and conclusory, and the parent-subsidiary relationship between Mars, Inc. and Wrigley was insufficient, standing alone, for liability. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
The last century’s landmark cases, which established products liability as it currently exists in the United States, involved consumer products.[1] The consumer products were sold to, or were designed to be used by, ordinary consumers, without any technical training or knowledge. [read post]
The plaintiffs offered consumer reports indicating that 66 percent of consumers understand “natural” to mean the product does not contain artificial colors. [read post]
The orders ban the defendants from employing the “negative option” to sell products to consumers, (i.e., when the consumer’s silence is interpreted as consent to a purchase). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
   The CSPA generally defines “`unfair or deceptive consumer sales practices' as those that mislead consumers about the nature of the product they are receiving, while ‘unconscionable acts or practices' relate to a supplier manipulating a consumer's understanding of the nature of the transaction at issue. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:48 pm by admin
As with other industries, these standards facilitate compatibility among products and provide consumers with a wider range of products and capabilities than would otherwise be available. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Rob Green
A federal judge in California has refused to dismiss a lawsuit claiming that General Mills, Inc. was misleading consumers about the healthiness and fruit content of its ‘Fruit Roll-Ups’ and ‘Fruit by the Foot’ product lines. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sanderson Farms, Inc., 2018 WL 922247, No. 17-cv-03592 (N.D. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Amazon.com, Inc., 2023 FCA 165 at para 47. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Sean Wajert
GSK Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) Inc., No. 19-CV-2886 (EK) (PK), 2021 WL 4502439, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:59 am by Kristi Wolff and Jaclyn Metzinger
Breaking from this trend in May, the Central District of California ruled that a proposed class action alleging that Just Brands USA Inc. and other companies overstated the amount of CBD contained in their products could proceed without waiting for the FDA to promulgate new regulations. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Toshiba Corp. of Japan, Toshiba America, Inc. of New York, New York, Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C. of Wayne, New Jersey, and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. of Irvine, California (collectively, “Toshiba”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and sell within the U.S. after importation certain products containing interactive program guide (IPG) and parental controls technology,… [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm by Natalie Kirby
A harmed consumer of a product can hold a manufacturer, whom they have no contract with, liable for the resulting damages. [read post]