Search for: "TV COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. PRIME TIME COMMUNICATIONS, LLC" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scripps Networks Interactive, LLC, 2011 WL 1750711 (W.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Does Disney's $52.4 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox give the combined content and broadcasting behemoth a chance of competing with Netflix or Amazon Prime? [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On the same day, a statement was read out in resolution of the defamation case Dinah Rose KC v (1) Jonathan Ames (2) Times Media Ltd KB 2023-000485. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Ltd [2021] EWHC 2366 (QB) (24 August 2021),  Murray J determined that the defendant had not published the words complained of in the course of a broadcast. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Amid wardrobe malfunctions, raised middle fingers and other Super Bowl sensations, the nature of what is too “indecent” for prime time broadcast is hotly contested, particularly since standards are applied more stringently to radio and TV than other media. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 24 and 25 March 2021 there was a trial  in the libel case of Junejo v New Vision TV Limited before Murray J. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Using Data and Respecting Users,, Communications of the ACM, 2020, Marshall W. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
  “There is not a standard policy on how police should handle relations with communities or with journalists. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Two Ofcom investigations into GB News TV and radio broadcasts remain ongoing. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Ø January 26, 2009 decision hereØ SCOTUS docket hereØ SCOTUSwiki here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]