Search for: "Taurus Development Corporation"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2007, 7:40 am
(ii) "Owner's real property" does not include a public right-of-way or a common area of a condominium, apartment complex, or townhouse development [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 7:40 am
(ii) "Owner's real property" does not include a public right-of-way or a common area of a condominium, apartment complex, or townhouse development [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:00 pm
It has its own in-use rocket family, Taurus, which launches from Wallops Island, Va. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm
Forjas Taurus, S.A. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:35 am
On Monday Bolden was at the Stennis Space Center to witness a test-firing of the engines that will be used on Orbital’s Taurus 2 rocket being developed under the COTS program. [read post]
28 May 2011, 8:18 am
“It is a commercial endeavor, and not a traditional government cost-plus development. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Taurus II would be the largest ELV expected to be launched from MARS Pad 0-A under the Proposed Action. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:58 am
MTLFreeTV, one of the defendants, argued the boxes are similar to a tablet or computer, and the company does not develop, produce, service or maintain the software that comes with the boxes. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[xxxiii] The company continues to push forward with technology development that will make this possible. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
Yes ___ No ___Microsoft objects to the separate references to different corporate entities. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:13 am
One company may have to raise its prices (or reduce its margins, or a combination of both), while the other can invest its licensing income into more research and development or other business functions. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Ltd (Scotland), heard 13 Jun 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Ltd (Scotland), heard 13 Jun 2017. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
And, he notes, they can cause lots of conflicts with existing corporate clients. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
Taurus Troubles Two Bulls! [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
But interestingly this view caused a split with the actual creators of music who were taking a very different view to the corporate owners of copyrights - as they still saw big benefits from the planned Copyright Directive. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
