Search for: "The Republic of Argentina" Results 1 - 20 of 589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 4:07 am by traceydennis
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2010] EWCA Civ 41; [2010] WLR (D) 28 “A court had no jurisdiction to permit a claimant to serve proceedings on a foreign state unless it was satisfied that there was, at the least, a good arguable case that the defendant state was not immune from suit. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:31 am by traceydennis
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Court of Appeal “An English Court had no jurisdiction to enforce a United States court judgment since there was no treaty between the two countries for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments; the appropriate way was to bring an action on the judgment in England to enforce it. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:07 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Queen’s Bench Division “A foreign state was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity to avoid enforcement of a judgment validly obtained in another overseas jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:59 am by sally
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] WLR (D) 220 “The Republic of Argentina was not entitled, by virtue of section 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, to state immunity in respect of proceedings brought in England for the enforcement of a judgment obtained in New York. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
Iran's MEHR News Agency reports on a criminal lawsuit filed in Argentina by three members of the Argentine Second Republic Movement against the Delegation of Israeli Associations in Argentina (DAIA). [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Republic of Argentina, the district court rejected a challenge by Argentina to service of process in an action to enforce a German judgment brought by unhappy investors in Argentina’s German bonds. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:49 pm by James Hamilton
Supreme Court ruling that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act did not immunize Argentina from the post-judgment discovery of information concerning its extraterritorial assets, were not part of the exchange.The Court was reviewing a Second Circuit ruling that the Republic of Argentina’s decision to pay only holders of the exchange bonds it newly issued, but not holders of its old bonds (including the plaintiff hedge funds), constituted a breach of the pari passu… [read post]