Search for: "Total Quality Logistics, LLC" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 7:10 am by Jill K. Bigler
The day after obtaining federal brokerage authority for the logistics company he formed a month earlier, Christopher Johnson, a North Carolina resident, resigned from his employment with Cincinnati-based Total Quality Logistics, LLC (“TQL”). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Total Quality Logistics, LLC, No. 2014-1828.In Fay, the Court of Appeals determined that an indefinite non-disclosure agreement operated as a stealth non-competition restriction, because it provided that if the ex-employee entered into a similar business as his employer and worked in a similar type of position, he would "necessarily and inevitably" use the employer's confidential information to perform his job. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:20 am by Will Aitchison
Total Quality Logistics, LLC, 2011 WL 1791094 (S.D.Ohio 2011), Magistrate Judge Greg Wehrman had to deal with forty-two subpoenas duces tecum issued by the defendant to prior and subsequent employers, as well as colleges and universities, of ten named plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the cryptocurrency statistics website Coinschedule, a grand total of 234 projects have raised over $3.6 billion through ICOs in 2017 alone – with no slowdown in sight. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am by Michael Ehline
The new ruling insists that Davis had no ownership of third-party business records and that his network provider was the one creating, storing, and maintaining records, which meant that the network provider had total control of that data. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Reform Act’s provisions apply to federal court class actions brought under the 1933 Act and 1934 Act.[14] Under the Reform Act, lead plaintiffs asserting 1933 Act or 1934 Act claims on behalf of a class are no longer selected based on who wins the “race to the courthouse” – instead, courts must engage in a process to determine which purported class member is “most capable of adequately representing the interests of class members” as the lead plaintiff.[15]… [read post]