Search for: "Trade Secret Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 4,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 11:58 am by David S. Poppick
Failure to protect corporate trade secrets had dire consequences for AGC, Inc., a Connecticut aviation component manufacturer forced to file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 16, 2013. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:23 am
Business Wire is reporting that a pending trade secrets misappropriation case has settled. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:56 am by Howard Ullman
When a plaintiff asserts claims of trade secret misappropriation, it must own the underlying trade secrets, right? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:25 am
From the San Diego Business Journal, another big money verdict in a trade secrets case. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
In Yellowfin Yachts, Inc., the plaintiff claimed its customer list was a trade secret. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by Brian A. Hall
Support, Inc., 10-17784, 2012 WL 2993376 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Chemplex Indus., Inc., 10 So. 3d 202, 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), analyzed a corporation’s alleged claim of trade secret misappropriation by a business rival. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 9:29 pm by Patent Docs
Dianna DeVore of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP; Matthew Pugmire of Pfizer, Inc.; and Michael Samardzija of Dentons US LLP examine the alternative of using trade secrets to protect intellectual property in the life sciences. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:34 am by Chris Neumeyer
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, notoriously secretive Apple Inc. was forced to divulge many diverse, and fascinating, trade secrets in its closely-watched litigation with Samsung (now in jury deliberation). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:06 am by Epstein Becker Green
Now on Spilling Secrets, our podcast series on the future of non-compete and trade secrets law: The inevitable disclosure doctrine, expected to be a widely used tool to protect trade secrets after the famous PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]