Search for: "Turner v. Close et al" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm by Mark Litwak
Thus, similarities between unprotectible elements in the disputed works may not contribute to a determination of substantial similarity.Because questions of substantial similarity often present close questions of fact, Arnstein v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
From an ATL tipster: [T]here were E.D.N.Y. judges, law clerks (including Second Circuit clerks), and court personnel in the gallery section of the courtroom while Posner et al. testified. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
’” To support the majority decision, Justice Kennedy cites three main cases that established precedent regarding jailing and invasive searches: Turner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
’” To support the majority decision, Justice Kennedy cites three main cases that established precedent regarding jailing and invasive searches: Turner v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
If a law does require the platforms to host various materials, all it would take is for the platforms to sufficiently inform the public about that law—something the Facebooks and Twitters of the world have ample communicative resources to do, for instance using a clickthrough warning that they can show once or a few times to their users. [169] Brief Amici Curiae of the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association, Law Student Associations, et al., Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Allen, et aL, Nos. 2:06-cv-695-WKW, 2:06-cv-WKW, 2007 WL 4463489, Mem. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
” However, with enough coordinated large trades in the one minute window (in a process known as “banging the close”), it could be possible to manipulate the “fixes. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
Tornillo (what it correctly calls the “pathmarking” case), PG&E, Turner, and Hurley: Social-media platforms’ content-moderation decisions are, we think, closely analogous to the editorial judgments that the Supreme Court recognized in Miami Herald, Pacific Gas, Turner, and Hurley. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
PriceDocket: 10-10Issue(s): Whether an indigent defendant has a constitutional right to appointed counsel at a civil contempt proceeding that results in his incarceration.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of South Carolina)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. [read post]