Search for: "U. S. v. Perrin" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
In patent law, as in all statutory construction, "[u]nless otherwise defined, 'words will be interpreted as taking their ordinary, contemporary, common meaning.'" Diehr, supra, at 182 (quoting Perrin v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  First, there was a statement in the case of Hoppen v MGN Ltd [pdf] and second there was one in the case of Hilary Perrin v MGN Ltd [pdf]. [read post]