Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Wiley"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Supap Kirtsaeng, a Thai citizen who came to the United States in 1997 to study mathematics, asked friends and family in Thailand to buy the English-language versions of his textbooks in Thailand, where they were cheaper and mail them to him. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Millions sold in the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
United States of America, U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
United States of America, U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Wiley alleged that selling the foreign textbooks in the United States infringed its U.S. copyrights on its American editions. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., which was argued last October and presents the question of whether the “first sale doctrine” under the Copyright Act applies to copyrighted works made and legally purchased outside the United States and then imported into the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:23 am
Yet in the 2013 Kirtsaeng v Wiley case, such parallel importation was found legal. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
