Search for: "United States of America v. BP Products North America Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
The 22 Energy Producers include: (1) ExxonMobil Corporation; (2) BP P.L.C.; (3) BP America, Inc.; (4) BP Products North America, Inc.; (5) Chevron Corporation; (6) Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; (7) Conocophillips Company; (8) Royal Dutch Shell PLC; (9) Shell Oil Company; (10) Peabody Energy Corporation; (11) The AES Corporation; (12) American Electric Power Company, Inc.;… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps BP Lubricants – United States files amicus curiae brief arguing that Rule 9(b) should apply in false marking cases – In re BP Lubricants USA Inc (Gray on Claims) Butterball – False marking plaintiffs get creative and dig deeper to support intent to deceive allegations: Buyers v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
BP Products North America, Inc., 2009 WL 3169463, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
which causes actual damage to the business or goodwill of the trader bringing the action.In the recent ‘ Vodkat’ case, Diageo North America Inc v Intercontinental Brands (ICB) Ltd [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch), Arnold J held that "vodka" is a term that is capable of distinguishing a particular class and quality of product. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
BP America Production Co.Docket: 10-890Issue(s): Given a constantly present massive inventory of goods bound for interstate commerce, does the fact that individual units of those goods are "in transit" result in the goods being exempt from local taxation under the dormant Commerce Clause? [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
We also have one big new rescheduled case: BP Exploration & Production Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
” Virginia: The United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, on February 14, 2012, reversed the Eastern District of Virginia in a noncompete case (BP Products North America Incorporated v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
BMW North America, LLC, et. al. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The… [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Holland 1916, Inc., of 1340 Burlington Street, North Kansas City, Mo., failed to file the disclosure reports with state and federal authorities for the calendar years 2006, 2007 and 2008, according to a consent agreement and final order filed in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 2, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle,Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
