Search for: "United States v. Elizabeth Anderson" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
Anderson On March 3, 2009, the United States Supreme Court determined that Respondents, a group of organizations dedicated to protecting the environment, did not have standing to challenge certain United States Forest Service (“Service”) regulations respecting salvage timber sales. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Anderson, PhD Candidate, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, @asandrson Excerpt: Introduction & Part III[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Han also shared the Biden administration’s executive order giving national security direction to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Tricia Bacon and Elizabeth Grimm wrote about the importance of the founders of terrorist organizations in establishing frameworks for the future leaders and explored the role of safe havens. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:03 pm
United Jersey Bank, 189 N.J. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm by Hayley Evans
The shoring up of Hezbollah’s position, as well as the election’s huge blow to the movement by Lebanon’s most prominent Sunni Muslim politician and ally of the West, Prime Minister Saad Hariri, will likely alarm the United States, Israel, and Gulf Arab states like Saudi Arabia. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Anderson, Jurecic, and Rozenshtein, sat down with Katie Benner to discuss the Jan. 6 committee hearings, NYSRPA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
District Court Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
In Syria, the United States once again launched air strikes against the Khorasan group, a faction of the al Nusra Front, on Wednesday night. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 5:10 am by William Ford
Vanessa Sauter posted the Lawfare Podcast, in which Vladeck and Scott Anderson discuss the intricacies of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCourtney Anderson, Georgia State University College of Law Medha D. [read post]