Search for: "United States v. Flores-Lopez"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2012, 7:03 pm
In an opinion by Judge Posner, the Seventh Circuit held on Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
The Petitioner (Flores-Lopez) resisted a police officer, and the question is whether that's a "crime of violence" that gets him deported.The correct answer to that question is not crystal clear. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm
In a case of great technological interest, on February 29, 2012, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 11:05 am
United States, No. 05-7664. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:41 pm
Judge Posner has authored an interesting opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
United States, and City of Boerne v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Flores-Lopez, 10-3803 (7th Cir. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:07 pm
Flores-Lopez, the Seventh U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
Flores-Lopez doesn’t disappoint. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The next part of Judge Posner’s discussion: I noticed a citation in the court’s opinion to a case from my court, United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
See Miranda–Lopez, 532 F.3d at 1040 (citing United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
The most recent bipartisan proposal would, in many cases, require detention of minors (in violation of the 1997 Flores v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
Recently, Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh Circuit pondered similar connundra in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
See Miranda–Lopez, 532 F.3d at 1040 (citing United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:11 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Lopez (1995) United States v. [read post]
