Search for: "United States v. Kebodeaux"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 10:34 am
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:34 am
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 8:44 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
The transcript in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
KEBODEAUX - Leagle.com In 1999, Kebodeaux, a twenty-one-year-old member of the United States Air Force, was convicted under Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice ("UCMJ"), 10 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:59 am
Justice Breyer authored the opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court held, 7-2, in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
Texas United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:15 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:40 am
Sebelius, and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:50 am
The issue is whether such a recommendation qualifies as “property” under the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime to obtain property by threats. ** United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:02 am
The majority [in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
On Monday, the Court also heard argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
