Search for: "Unknown John Does" Results 1 - 20 of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 2:52 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Because the other driver here was unknown, Tennessee’s uninsured motorist statute also applied, which requires the plaintiff to “issue a John Doe warrant against the unknown owner or operator in order to come within the coverage of the owner’s uninsured motorist policy. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 8:22 am by Anthony Carbone, PC
The New Jersey Court Rules actually provide for using the name John Doe when the given name and surname of a party is unknown. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Abhik Majumdar
Moreover, it was in the nature of a "John Doe injunction", that is, it applied to any and all persons, even unknown ones. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On April 1, 2019, Pa.R.C.P. 2005, which governs the use of “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” designations in pleadings, took effect. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:06 am by Cleveland Law Library
Bryan has clarified when plaintiffs can and cannot name John Doe defendants under Civil Rule 15. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  Sometimes, as was the case in the other recent trademark complaint with a "John Doe" defendant, revealing the identity of the unknown defendant is largely procedural. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by LTA-Editor
By Max Burke Nutritional supplement company Ubervita filed a lawsuit this month against John Does, claiming the “unknown defendants have conspired to disrupt Ubervita’s business through a campaign of dirty tricks. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:16 pm by Cal Law
Prior to his identification, the warrant issued for the rapist's arrest had read "John Doe, male black. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:11 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Plaintiff sued some unknownJohn Doe” defendants who infringed plaintiff’s copyrights. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:05 am by Patrick E. Knie
The plaintiff filed suit in the Circuit Court of Darlington County, naming “John Doe, individually and doing business as Doe Trucking Company” as the defendant and seeking actual and punitive damages from the operator of the unknown truck that had been carrying the item that allegedly caused the crash. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:26 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-1058, the appeals court overruled the district court's grant of ex parte discovery, ruling that mass John Doe cases could not be brought where there was no known basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over the unknown defendants, and on alternative grounds that there could be no joinder merely because defendants allegedly downloaded the same file through BitTorrent and therefore possibly in the same "swarm". [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:05 am by Patrick E. Knie
The plaintiff filed suit in the Circuit Court of Darlington County, naming “John Doe, individually and doing business as Doe Trucking Company” as the defendant and seeking actual and punitive damages from the operator of the unknown truck that had been carrying the item that allegedly caused the crash. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Cohen agreed with Westchester County that the petition improperly names John Does "1" through "100" as Petitioners.The court said that although CPLR 1024 provides for the naming of unknown parties as defendants in an action, it does not provide for the naming of unidentified Petitioners in an Article 78 proceeding.The judge also faulted the Association for failing to come forward with any statutory authority for naming unknown… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:06 am by Sarah Miley
[JURIST]The Supreme Court of California [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-2 Monday to authorize the use of "John Doe" arrest warrants, which replace an unknown suspect's name with his or her DNA profile as the unique identifier. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 7:42 am by Charles Scholle
Thus, the injured parties brought suit against the car that rear-ended them and “John Doe” (i.e. the individual in the car that left the scene). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
New Albany, IN -Copyright lawyers for First Time Videos LLC of Nevada filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indianaalleging 18 Indiana John Does, whose names and addresses are unknown, infringed the copyrighted work "FTV - TIFFANY" which has been registered by the US Copyright Office. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
"She ruled that the effect of the law was punitive rather than civil.Mitchell said a ruling in the appeal could affect the John Doe cases. [read post]