Search for: "Unknown Medical Doctor D W C C"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Fla. 2009) (“[w]here a physician fails to review the warnings issued by the manufacturer, proximate cause cannot be established”). [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Flowers, Paul W. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am
Doctor falsely tells you you don’t have cancer: is this subject to strict scrutiny? [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:25 pm
29 CFR § 825.110(d). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:49 am
Perhaps I should issue a disclaimer here: I'm not a doctor, and I'm not giving medical advice here. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Three weeks after admission, as of the reporting date, the child remained on dialysis and had unknown neurological consequences.This fits with a reported pattern of approximately 8 days for incubation of O104:H4 [1], about twice as long as for O157:H7. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
SCOTT W. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
., 2012 WL 33360, at *5 n.6 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
Here is the relevant language from Best: “[A] doctor’s differential diagnosis is reliable and admissible where the doctor (1) objectively ascertains, to the extent possible, the nature of the patient’s injury…, (2) ‘rules in’ one or more causes of the injury using a valid methodology, and (3) engages in ‘standard diagnostic techniques by which doctors normally rule out alternative cause [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C-FJG,2006 WL 1779035, (W.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Sox, Michael C. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:17 am
C. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
Tollefson, 2012 WL 6737776 (D. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
David D. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Supp.2d 936, 950 (D. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
The assurance of fairness preserved by public presence at a trial is not lost when one party's cause is pursued under a fictitious name.[8] Nonetheless, even courts that take this view acknowledge that "there remains a clear and strong First Amendment interest in ensuring that '[w]hat transpires in the courtroom is public property.'"[9] And other courts put it even more strongly: [L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
You've seen doctors wearing these in operating rooms, and you've also seen East Asians wearing them in airports. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
Indeed, on the whole, because the issues and evidence are relatively streamlined, the merits relatively easy to comprehend and handicap, and the key witnesses often doctors and scientists who are trying to cure diseases and fix ailments, these cases can be excellent candidates for trials.[6] Myth #2: Management puts the company at risk if it speaks too positively regarding its expectations of clinical trial results, FDA approval, or product commercialization. [read post]
