Search for: "VCS PROPERTIES" Results 1 - 20 of 402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2007, 6:57 am
Sabrina Safrin is guest blogging this week at the VC on her latest article Chain Reaction: How Property Begets Property. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:54 am
There are two interesting property-related posts up at the VC. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
Ilya Somin, the libertarian counterpart to GMU's natural law duo of Mossoff and Claeys, has a post at the VC on Property in the Lord of the Rings. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:01 am by William Carleton
They pay for their equity, often in a combination of cash and intellectual (intangible) property. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:38 am
On the subject of Nestor's post immediately below, Jonathan Adler at the VC notes that the most pro-property rights opinion in Wilkie was Justice Ginsburg's dissent. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:56 am
Adam Mossoff is blogging this week at the VC on his article on The Rise and Fall of the Sewing Machine Patent Thicket. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:15 am
Over at the VC, Jonathan Adler has an interesting post on Wilkie v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 8:47 am
Ilya Somin at the VC has the details on the 5th Circuit's decision in Western Seafood Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:43 am
According to David Bernstein at the VC, Adam Mossoff is moving from Michigan State to George Mason. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 8:37 am
Ilya Somin at the VC has a substantive analysis of the initiatives. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:58 am
The deprivation of those property interests by delaying their provisions, without justification and without any procedure to expedite, violates veterans’ constitutional rights. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 6:52 pm by Nate Nead
These transactions dominated the big portfolio deals in 2013.[11]  In 2014, M&A transactions outperformed buyout and VC transactions due to an increase in M&A activity for self-storage properties.4 However, in 2016, VC transactions outperformed M&A transactions. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:36 am by Stephen Page
The Full Court of the Family Court has recently held that trial judges should avoid hearing setting aside proceedings under section 106B of the Family Law Act separately from the related property settlement proceedings under section 79 of the Family Law Act.In VC and GC, Justices Warnick, Boland and Thackray held:It is generally undesirable to have a discrete hearing of a s 106B application. [read post]