Search for: "Vehicle Operation Technologies LLC v. General Motors Company" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm by Matt Murphy
Interestingly, in 2015, Arizona governor Doug Ducey used an executive order to declare Arizona a regulation-free AV zone in order to attract testing operations from companies like Uber.[9] In Lommatzsch v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 6:12 am by Kevin LaCroix
Cruise LLC is GM’s majority-owned segment responsible for developing autonomous vehicle (AV) technology. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
General Motors Company acquired operations from General Motors Corporation on July 10, 2009 and references to prior periods in this and other press materials refer to operations of the old General Motors Corporation. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:22 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
General Motors Corp. (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 849, 859 (internal citation omitted). [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
  If PerDiemCo was instead an operating company, then outcome would have been totally different.[15] Forum state’s interest in adjudicating the dispute. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Obama attorney-general pick good news for IP, says US Chamber of Commerce (IAM) ‘The future of the patent system’ features four former PTO leaders (Hal Wegner) CAFC to hear oral argument in USPTO v GSK & Tafas 5 December (Anticipate This!) [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pocono Mountain Recovery Center, LLC., No. 8167 - CV - 2016 (C.P. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent Reissue No. 39,038 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALERTING AN OPERATOR OF A MOTOR VEHICLE TO AN INCOMING RADAR SIGNAL and owned by Hoyt Fleming. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent Reissue No. 39,038 entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALERTING AN OPERATOR OF A MOTOR VEHICLE TO AN INCOMING RADAR SIGNAL and owned by Hoyt Fleming. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
Supreme Court: (i) EPA published two endangerment findings under the Clean Air Act, triggering a mandatory duty for EPA to adopt regulations to control emissions from power plants, industries, motor vehicles, and other sources; (ii) EPA issued tailpipe emission standards for new cars and trucks under the Clean Air Act; and (iii) EPA issued Best Available Control Technology (BACT) guidance for new sources and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for existing sources of… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Footnotes: [1] Generally, Chrysler LLC, et. al., Case No. 09-50002 (AJG) (Bankr. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Process waters include waters from concrete production manufacturing operations such as vehicle and equipment cleaning, and concrete truck washout and can contain caustic chemicals that are toxic to fish and other aquatic life. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. (2000) 529 U.S. 861, 868, 120 S.Ct. 1913, 146 L.Ed.2d 914) (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) “[A] reading of the express pre-emption provision that excludes common-law tort actions gives actual meaning to the saving clause's literal language, while leaving adequate room for state tort law to operate-for example, where federal law creates only a floor, i.e., a minimum safety standard. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The company addressed the violations and now operates in compliance with Ohio’s hazardous waste laws. [read post]