Search for: "Vigil v. Hughe"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
It is clear from the recent case law that the courts must be vigilant when anonymity orders are sought by either party and especially vigilant when both parties agree on anonymity. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 4:09 pm
I recently had the honour to be invited to give a guest lecture to the Copyright Society of Australia in Sydney. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
The Hughes Court certainly seemed to head toward a general rule that states must make reasonable efforts to appoint (and thereby pay) counsel for the indigent.Yet, in Avery v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
(E.g., Humana Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:32 pm
" Ford v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:00 am
At the same time, lawyers must be vigilant to ensure IP owners are aware of the risks of sending unlawful cease and desist letters. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
He noted that it was Hugh’s personal courage and determination which had led to the success of the Conference. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
In the following guest post, Dennis Klein of the Hughes Hubbard & Reed law firm provides an overview of what he views as the takeaways for corporate directors and officers from the financial crisis D&O litigation. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
This year's was on blue-sky laws, with just a glimpse of New Deal securities regulation and the Hughes Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
Stone, eds., Eternally Vigilant: Free Speech in the Modern Era (University of Chicago Press, 2002). [read post]
