Search for: "Vivint" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm by Bloomberg
SunEdison Inc. has yet to complete its $1.9 billion purchase of Vivint Solar Inc. and it’s already shopping some of the company’s rooftop solar assets. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm by Daily Record Staff
., the world’s largest renewable energy development company, and its subsidiary, TerraForm Power, a Bethesda-based owner and operator of clean energy power plants, have agreed to a $2.2 billion purchase deal to acquire Vivint Solar, the companies announced Monday. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:15 am by Clint Wilkins
However, in In re Vivint, the Federal Circuit held that the USPTO has the authority to discretionarily deny an ex parte reexamination request under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:15 am by Clint Wilkins
However, in In re Vivint, the Federal Circuit held that the USPTO has the authority to discretionarily deny an ex parte reexamination request under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Thursday, December 20th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in Vivint, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:23 pm by Madeline Thomas
With Vivint’s first appeal of a massive punitive judgment denied, it is important to understand the ramifications As a lawyer, part of my job is to rain on everyone’s parade […] Source [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:25 pm by Scott McKeown
The ’513 was ultimately held invalid, and Vivint appealed. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 6:48 am by Logan Murr
In 2015, Vivint, Inc. sued Alarm.com for infringement of three patents, U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:32 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled today in a precedential opinion that Alarm.com, which was denied institution on three inter partes review (IPR) petitions it filed against patents owned by Vivint, Inc., could not simply “repackage” arguments raised in its IPR petition to challenge the same patent via ex parte reexamination. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
Vivint Solar, the Second Circuit provided important guidance for determining when an omission in a registration statement is material for purposes of a Section 11 claim. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
The Second Circuit concluded that when viewed in the context of the registration statement’s extensive disclosures on Vivint’s six prior quarters and unique business, Vivint’s third quarter results were consistent with past performance and “the successful implementation of its business model. [read post]