Search for: "Volvo Trucks North America Inc. "
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 9:02 am
According to the NHTSA, Volvo Group North America, a collective of several manufacturers of heavy-duty trucks and buses, which is a separate entity from Volvo Cars, did not recall vehicles in a timely fashion or comply with other recall and reporting requirements. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of In re Volvo Group North America, LLC, the plaintiffs were members of the family of a professional truck driver who died in a truck accident in 2013. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Ford Motor Company - Ford Commercial Truck Daimler Trucks North America LLC - Freightliner Trucks - Western Star Trucks Navistar, Inc. - International Trucks Isuzu Commercial Truck of America - Isuzu Truck PACCAR Inc - Kenworth Truck - Peterbilt Motors Volvo Group North America - Volvo Trucks North America - Mack… [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
Volvo Trucks North America Inc., et al. (45-CV-2013-9000091.00). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:32 am
America, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Volvo Trucks North America Inc) the Plaintiff was operating a fully-loaded tractor trailer when, without warning, all electrical power failed and the vehicle started to jack-knife. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
(“Crescent”) operated a Volvo dealership pursuant to a Dealer Sales and Services Agreement (“Dealer Agreement”) with Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:17 am
Modernization and harmonization was arguably called for in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court case, Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
Reynolds at 10, quoting Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
§ 1114 The following of Hayes' U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates (including the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers) have filed petitions for relief under chapter 11 concurrently with Hayes (2578) and have obtained joint administration therewith: Hayes Lemmerz Finance LLC (7731), Hayes Lemmerz International Import, Inc. (1655), Hayes Lemmerz International - California, Inc. (2337), Hayes Lemmerz International Commercial Highway,… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:08 am
" -- These seven cases--Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
Cash & Henderson, supra, at 210 (“the ‘hallmark of the requisite competitive injury’ is the diversion of sales to a favored purchaser” [quoting Volvo Trucks of North America v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:13 pm
The Alliance represents 77% of all car and light truck sales in the United States, including the BMW Group, Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz USA, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota, Volkswagen Group of America and Volvo Cars North America. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., 2009 WL 588432, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., 2009 WL 588432, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., 2009 WL 588432, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., 2009 WL 588432, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
