Search for: "Vringo Infrastructure Inc."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 9:29 am
Vringo’s intellectual property portfolio consists of over 500 patents and patent applications covering telecom infrastructure, internet search, and mobile technologies. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:36 pm
So, you might expect that I would have been surprised to learn that US-based non-practising entity (NPE) Vringo Infrastructure Inc has commenced patent infringement proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia against the local subsidiary of Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer ZTE Corporation. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:26 pm
A recent procedural decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 177) has revealed new details of the case against Chinese telecoms equipment manufacturer ZTE by Vringo Infrastructure, Inc.Vringo is a US-based non-practising entity (NPE) which commenced patent infringement proceedings against the Australian subsidiary of the Chinese company ZTE Corporation back in June 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 1:08 am
Stefano explains:On Friday, Mr Justice Birss delivered a dense, well thought, albeit perhaps slightly unexpected, judgment in Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:41 am
However, it has been argued that what Chinese patents lack in terms of quality can be made up by the huge numbers of filings that are happening.Once upon a time the spinning wheel was novelA transition to being the ‘good guys’In the recent case Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat) (see Katpost here) the Chinese company ZTE was sued by the US company Vringo for infringement of its patent. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
.* 3G standard essential patent valid and infringed: irrelevant whether Vringo is a troll Former guest Kat and PatLit team member Stefano Barazza recounts Mr Justice Birss’s judgment in Vringo Infrastructure Inc v ZTE (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 3924 (Pat). [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
As Shalini Bengani explains in this post,TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), decided by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, is another one of those cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Last week was the busiest in the IPKat's history, with a total of 29 blogposts. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
In the earlier case of Vringo v. [read post]
