Search for: "WHO DAT, INCORPORATED"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2010, 4:30 pm
now has federal priority in a federal trademark registration incorporating the phrase WHO DAT dating all the way back to 2002. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:08 am
” Related posts:Who Dat Owns ‘Who Dat’? [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 am
This Kat has learned from a Dutch Katfriend who wishes to remain anonymous but nonetheless tweets as 'Pacta sunt servanda' (@TreatyNotifier) that it is Court of First Instance of The Hague (Rechtbank Den Haag), not the the Court of Appeal, which has decided to refer the case. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:54 pm
Todd is a member of the e-Discovery Analysis and Technology (e-DAT) Group. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:42 am
First the headline, if all you want to know is “Who won? [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:39 am
Other disputes involving popular phrases have been more traditional: After wrangling with the NFL and the New Orleans Saints regarding trademark rights over WHO DAT? [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:19 pm
If the model was "nemo dat", then if the conveyance is made to you by someone who did not have the right to convey the property to you, your title is void, even though you had no knowledge of the fraud. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
(Shades of the “Who Dat” kerfuffle that arose in 2010!) [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Aug. 28, 2013) Hey, another trademark overclaiming case involving Fleurty Girl (WHO DAT?). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
It’s the brainchild of a British chap named Andrew Moore who works from Miami, Florida. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Although this view is more or less correct, it appears from a perusal of the decisions rendered prior to 1899 that the judges ended up judicially incorporating the dichotomy in their decisions. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Presumptive Amount of Temporary Maintenance Unjust or Inappropriate Where There Were Substantial Marital Assets Subject to Equitable Distribution, and Plaintiff Waited 3 ½ Years Prior to Seeking Temporary Maintenance In Salai v Salai, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5526030 (N.Y.Sup.) [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
Presumptive Amount of Temporary Maintenance Unjust or Inappropriate Where There Were Substantial Marital Assets Subject to Equitable Distribution, and Plaintiff Waited 3 ½ Years Prior to Seeking Temporary Maintenance In Salai v Salai, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5526030 (N.Y.Sup.) [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Cold War vet; exempt
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date6
01/28/2008
takes effect on (1/03/2008) the same date and in the same manner as chapter 655/2007, takes effect Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.67
A8582A
Alessi (MS) -- Relates to the prevailing wage paid by individuals who are awarded public works contracts BLURB : Lab. prevailing wage
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date7
… [read post]
