Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores East I LP "
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 7:16 pm
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (3D08-3219), the Third District reversed the entry of a temporary injunction. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:48 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, issued on July 11. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:54 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, January 12, 2018, Cogburn, M. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
The Southern District of Alabama found (Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, March 26, 2013) that any employee’s use of the n-word was “patently offensive,” but an “isolated utterance on a single occasion,” not directed at anyone in the workplace, was a stray remark that failed to meet the legal threshold for a cognizable Title VII claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
That's what the unavoidably unsafe product concept is all about.One thing we don't have any qualms over, however is the court's alternative policy ground, recognizing that presuming even adequate warnings will be heeded is an out and out fiction:[I]t is not logical to presume that a plaintiff would have heeded an adequate warning, if provided. [read post]
