Search for: "Whittington v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2018, 9:50 am by Deborah Pearlstein
  Whittington emphasizes “two considerations that should weigh on the minds of the justices and that might give them pause before extending the logic of United States v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:15 pm by Sandy Levinson
One other quite obvious question:  Assume that one is completely confident that originalism requires independent electors, just as James Madison never ever said he was mistaken in 1791 in arguing that the Bank of the United States was unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
  The Public and the Courts ,   Greg Caldeira   Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States   35. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm by Keith E. Whittington
Virginia has now become the 38th state to vote to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, which arguably crosses the ratification threshold set out in Article V of the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 7:40 pm by Keith E. Whittington
The Secretary of State announced that the United States would impose sanctions on a prosecutor of the International Criminal Court who is investigating American personnel for war crimes. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am by Nicholas Mosvick
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, President Adams appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:57 am by Keith E. Whittington
North Carolina State University] I noted last month that a Fourth Circuit panel had handed down a divided decision in Porter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:37 pm
This shows we take Article V and VI seriously.Informal change can be approached by studying the development of state institutions over time. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
And those who are intratextually minded are likely to consider the Fourteenth Amendment, which provides:"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Stephanie Zable
Matthew Kahn posted audio of the full oral argument from United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Keith E. Whittington
As I observed in the earlier posts, the traditional understanding of the impeachment power in the United States up until the early twentieth century was that the "impeachment" occurs when an authorized member of the lower chamber appears on the floor of the upper chamber and "impeaches" an officer by formally leveling an accusation and demanding a trial. [read post]