Search for: "Williams v. World Media Enterprises, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by Terry Hart
He also cited with concern a number of lower courts that have followed Duncan. 5E.g., Cable News Network, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
After the application was rejected by the EUIPO and EUIPO Appeal Board, the Skateboarding and fashion brand, FA World Entertainment Inc, took the case to the General Court who held that “Such an expression is very well known in informal language, which removes any originality in relation to the goods at issue. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
This is especially problematic given the increasing dominance and global reach of these large enterprises in the face of the expanding attempts of local courts and local laws to impose responsibilities on these social media giants to protect their citizens. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
, pens this post about the well-known and much-debated issue of the product plain packaging [on which see earlier Katposts here, here, here, and here].* Court of Appeal dismisses Rovi's claim construction attempt in battle with VirginA few days ago the Court of Appeal of England and Wales handed down its decision in Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 1214. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
This is especially problematic given the increasing dominance and global reach of these large enterprises in the face of the expanding attempts of local courts and local laws to impose responsibilities on these social media giants to protect their citizens. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Milton, MA; William Blumenreich, President) Biozein Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Attleboro, MA; Joseph Russo, President) Auto World Collision Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/9v7uJj AT&T Explains iPad Security Breach - http://nyti.ms/bTKvF2 Enterprise 2.0: Google, Microsoft, IBM Embrace The Cloud - http://tinyurl.com/2dlljv9 EU Official Encourages Use of Open Source Software - http://tinyurl.com/2388qrq How the World is Spending Its Time Online? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3n5rvqv (Gabe Acevedo) Of ZIP Codes, Web Privacy & the Law - http://tinyurl.com/3qhbrs2 (Stephen Bennett) Risks and Rewards: The Wild West of Social Media v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Fox Williams authors are Andrew Hill, Partner; Anisha Patel, Senior Associate; and Sam Tarrant and Olwen Mair, Associates. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]