Search for: "Wisconsin Rapids Public School District" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Wisconsin Rapids School District, 2010 WI 86 (July 16, 2010), that purely personal e-mails of public employees sent from workplace computers and e-mail accounts are protected from disclosure to a third party... [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Wisconsin Rapids School District, 2010 WI 86, the three-member Lead Opinion of the Court and one concurring Justice concluded that a records custodian should not release the content of an email that is purely personal and evinces no violation of law or policy. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Wisconsin Rapids School District, 2010 WI 86, the three-member Lead Opinion of the Court and one concurring Justice concluded that a records custodian should not release the content of an email that is purely personal and evinces no violation of law or policy. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
Wisconsin Rapids School District: In the present case, the court is asked to decide whether the contents of government employees' personal e-mails (that is, e-mails not related to government business) should be released to the public in keeping with the purpose and policy of the Sunshine Laws that the public be fully informed about the affairs of government and the official acts of government officers and employees.... [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:46 am
" The case involves a public records request sent by a citizen to the Wisconsin Rapids School District seeking emails "from the computer [the teachers] use during their school work day" from March 1, 2007 through April 13, 2007. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Wisconsin Rapids School District (certification by appellate court) WI State Bar Article (links to briefs and court docs) -Kathleen Bergin [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:12 am
Wisconsin Rapids School District, 2010 WI 86 (July 16, 2010), that purely personal e-mails of public employees sent from workplace computers and e-mail accounts are protected from disclosure to a third party under the state Public Records Law. [read post]
In other districts, some voters waited in line for four hours, and some were unable to cast a vote until after midnight. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
The Wisconsin Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide is a Guide for individuals and families in Wisconsin affected by cerebral palsy. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Case No. 10-2627), involving whether the press has a First Amendment right of access to streaming Internet coverage of high school sports tournaments, according to a story in The Wisconsin Rapids Tribune.The WIAA, which entered into exclusive contracts to stream high school sports tournaments over the Internet, sued in 2008 after The Post-Crescent in Appleton, Wisc. broadcast high school football playoffs using Internet streaming without WIAA permission… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Depending on the state, local income taxes may be levied by counties, municipalities, school districts, or special districts, with most levied by municipalities (3,816) and school districts (954). [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:46 am by Jackie Gardina, J.D.
,” USC Gould School of Law professor Nomi Stolzenberg provided a historical overview of how the Supreme Court has taken us from no prayer in school to prayer on the high school football field and the Ten Commandments in every public classroom. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Snowdon, retired Ombuds at University of Wisconsin–Madison New and Expanded Offices -- This year, 71 organizations created or increased the scope of their Ombuds programs (including a few that were overlooked or had a quiet launch in recent years). [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 3:03 pm
That's a lot of money not sent or spent on shoes, school supplies, haircuts or summer camp. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
School district: Which was unconstitutional, but you can't sue the school district. [read post]
District Court for the District of Arizona stated that it “was not persuaded” those prohibitions could be raised by a private party. [read post]